----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ryan Lane" <[email protected]>
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Jay Ashworth <[email protected]> wrote: > > He's complaining, in effect, that there are more than one URL for > > identical > > content, which is in fact generally a bad idea, but in this case, of > > course, > > he's wrong: different *access protocols* are being used, so it's not > > possible > > to conform the two... > > > > Whether it is in fact still a Best Practice to make sure that > > they're the > > same is another matter; I understand *why* we have a separate domain > > name > > for https, architecturally, but I'm not sure I *like* it. > > > > This is something I'd very much like to fix. I had a fairly in depth > discussion with the other ops folks about this last week. I think I'm > going to put it on my goal list; however, we have a lot of higher > priority tasks, so I wouldn't expect anything too soon. Oh, I'm not, and secure.* is fine for me, for now. But see my other note to River. Cheers, -- jra _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
