Roan Kattouw wrote: > 2011/2/14 Mark A. Hershberger <[email protected]>: >> If we have a 1.18 branch that is, as Brion has noted (and supported), a >> day or two behind trunk at most, is there a reason that the we couldn't >> branch wmfN from the rolling 1.18 branch? Or even just tag it when we >> wanted to mark a WMF deployment? >> > That works for me too. wmfN branches can't be tagged from release > branches, they have a different structure so you need to run a script > that branches off the various parts, but otherwise this sounds good. > > Roan Kattouw (Catrope)
I don't think there's a reason for maintaining that structure. It could mimic the REL1_X structure, with some server rules to plug some bits. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
