So,

I've looked, but can't find a (automated) recursive solution with
setTransparentTagHook and friends.

Is there one? Ie. need to be able to similarly hook into transparent-hook
tags within the content of the first transparent-hooked tag.

PS: recursiveTagParse does not look like it's transparent hook aware, and
anyway escapes html < style. mTransparentTagHooks are called from inside
parse() but calling parse from inside the hook doesn't look like the thing
to do. FYI: It's clear in the source only the outer hook is being applied.

Thanks.



_________________________________


Daniel Friesen-4 wrote:
> 
> Btw, you might want to try a transparent tag hook.
> 
> ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
> 
> On 11-03-08 04:21 AM, Mick P. wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been trying to arrange a more structured presentation for
>> documenting
>> binary file/data structure bit by bit.
>>
>> What I have in mind is to make sections appear like html fieldsets, eg.
>> <fieldset><legend>[newline]==section A==[newline]</legend>[nested
>> wikitext
>> here, possibly more fieldsets]</fieldset>  ... so what you get is a clean
>> encapsulation model for structure.
>>
>> I tried a lot of stuff. And eventually have reached the point where
>> tonight
>> I implemented the fieldset/legend tags as
>> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual_talk:Tag_extensions.
>>
>> This gave me more control / made possible the repair of the malformed<p>
>> tags introduced by MediaWiki (
>> http://en.swordofmoonlight.org/wiki/MDL_(file_format) )
>> ...
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Tag-Extensions-%2B-nested-section-wikitext-%3D-missing-section-%28ideas-%29-tp31096130p31103275.html
Sent from the Wikipedia Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to