On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Roan Kattouw <[email protected]> wrote: > 2011/3/22 Chad <[email protected]>: >> I've actually come to partially agree with you since the last time we >> discussed this. Really, the extension repository *should* remain in >> Subversion as it is. I would, however, like to move phase3 to git. >> Then i18n can just be two commits, instead of 400+ >> > Extensions in SVN but phase3 in git? That doesn't really make sense to > me, TBH. Would it really be the end of the world if we had phase3 in > one repo and all extensions in another repo? >
Perhaps in the long run. I think in the short-run it'd be more pain-free and perhaps a useful experiment to just move phase3 to git. Then we can see how we feel about moving the rest over (or if we hate it and want to go back) -Chad _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
