> When you look at the situation with the Toolserver where everybody has its > own toy source area you have a situation where internationalisation and the > upgrading of functionality to a production level is not happening. If GIT is > so great, then solve an existing pain which is the inability to collaborate > on toolserver tools. > > GIT is cool, it is the flavour of the month. It is an improvement when it > proves itself in what is in my opinion a manifest dysfunctional source > management environment. When the Toolserver sources are all in a GIT > repository and its localisation becomes manageable, you have the proof of > the pudding demonstrating problem solving ability. When internationalisation > and localisation are part of the solution you are convincing that we can > move to GIT.
Toolserver has a social problem, not a technological one. They have the ability to use SVN, or a source control system of their choosing, yet they don't. This thread is discussing a perceived problem with a tool we are already successfully using. Let's focus on one issue at a time. - Ryan Lane _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
