http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WYSIFTW ;-)


On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Ryan Kaldari <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe my brain just made a leap here, but is there a plan for
> implementing a web-based Javascript editor for MediaWiki?? This would be
> a hugely awesome feature. I've used jsFiddle (http://jsfiddle.net/)
> which is really slick - syntax color-coding, tabbing that works, a Tidy
> button(!), integrated jsLint(!).
>
> If not, hopefully, I've just created a self-fulfilling rumor :)
>
> Ryan Kaldari
>
> On 4/3/11 11:06 AM, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
>> I think the JS editor stuff would also fit well enough with the topics of the
>> Berlin hackathon in May...
>>
>> -- daniel
>>
>> On 03.04.2011 15:30, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
>>> Would any of those be useful project ideas for Google Summer of Code
>>> students?  If so, please add a bullet point or two:
>>>
>>> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Summer_of_Code_2011
>>>
>>> best,
>>> Sumana Harihareswara
>>>
>>> On 04/01/2011 10:11 PM, Conrad Irwin wrote:
>>>> Ok — yes loading speeds are definitely something worth improving.
>>>>
>>>> WT:PREFS to become gadgets has been discussed ever since gadgets was
>>>> released, it will happen one day :). Luckily that code is only loaded
>>>> for people who are using WT:PREFS, so it should have minimal impact.
>>>>
>>>> I'd be pretty interested to — do you have a guideline as to the
>>>> expected format. In particular I think the "core" of the editor, which
>>>> provides a framework for javascript to load, edit, undo, redo, and
>>>> save the page (with edit summaries) would be pretty useful everywhere.
>>>> It's documented in the first half of
>>>> http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:Conrad.Irwin/editor_docs and
>>>> there's a tutorial at
>>>> http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:Conrad.Irwin/editor_tutorial.js —
>>>> but it could do with "new-ification" (in particular some jQuery would
>>>> be nice, and there's probably a better javascript API wrapper than
>>>> JsMwApi :).
>>>>
>>>> Conrad
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Ryan Kaldari<[email protected]>   
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Good idea. After the 1.17 deployment, I've been trying to go through and
>>>>> clean-up some of the Javascript cruft that has built up on the various 
>>>>> wikis
>>>>> over the years. One of the main goals of 1.17 was improving page loading
>>>>> speeds by optimizing Javascript delivery. Of course if all the wikis are
>>>>> serving lots of old redundant Javascript, the optimization doesn't
>>>>> accomplish that much. On wiktionary specifically, the importScript and
>>>>> importExternalScript functions are redundant, and the Wiktionary:PREFS
>>>>> system should be retired now that Gadgets are available. I admit I was 
>>>>> much
>>>>> too gung-ho in my clean-up regarding Wiktionary, and I intend to let the
>>>>> admins there handle it from here.
>>>>>
>>>>> As long as we're on the subject of wiktionary, I notice that there's a lot
>>>>> of custom Javascript there for handling specialized editing tasks like
>>>>> editing glosses, managing translations, etc. It seems like some of this
>>>>> functionality could be improved further and developed into full-fledged
>>>>> extensions (making it easy for other wiktionaries to use as well). Would 
>>>>> you
>>>>> have any interest in working up a couple Wiktionary project proposals for
>>>>> the upcoming Hackathon in Berlin?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ryan Kaldari
>>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to