Default gadgets would solve an issue I am facing at the moment :) So +1 to deployment of updates.
Tom On 7 June 2011 22:25, Leo Koppelkamm <[email protected]> wrote: > There's usually some code (general utility fn's, some legacy remappings > etc.) in common.js that could break a lot of stuff if missing. +1 on moving > optional stuff to gadgets > > Leo > On Tuesday, June 7, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Chad wrote: > > 2011/6/7 Ildefons Stułbia <[email protected]>: > > > I would like to ask for deployment of new version of Gadgets > > > extension. It would be great to get rid of MediaWiki:Common.js by > > > splitting it into separate gadgets, enabled for everyone by default. > > > > Well I'm not sure getting rid of Common.js is a good idea. But moving > > optional features to Gadgets isn't a bad idea. > > > > -Chad > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
