On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Roan Kattouw <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Rob Lanphier <[email protected]> wrote: >> You're willing to say there are exactly *zero* fixes that would be >> needed to be done in trunk and merged into 1.18 as a result of making >> this change? >> > I guess the worst that could happen is that one of the bundled > extension breaks core in some way, in which case it's slightly worse > because we bundle the extension. Other than that, core is unaffected. >
This. >> I'm not going to dig my heels in on this one. However, I'd really >> like to encourage everyone to avoid piling non-critical into a release >> branch after it gets branched, and have the patience to wait for the >> following release. That's the only way we're ever going to speed up >> the release train. >> > I'm not particularly attached to it, and I think we can wait till 1.19 > if we want to. I just didn't think your arguments made much sense. > Also this. I think it's a good idea, but not worth putting aside 1.17 or 1.18 work to make it happen. Even if it didn't happen until 1.20, I don't think it'd be a huge deal...we'd just be maintaining the status quo. In the long run, I think it makes zero difference whatsoever, as once Real Extension Management becomes a reality, it shouldn't matter at all whether the extension was in the tarball or not--and in fact, I would argue we should keep them *out* of the tarball at that point, to keep download size to a minimum and since hopefully installing extensions would've become painless. -Chad _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
