Brandon Harris wrote:
>       As I said in the bug itself, by using red and green we are
> (accidentally) making a moral judgement about the revision.  Humans are
> hard-wired to see red as bad and green as good (blood vs. forest/life).
>    Revisions are, by their nature, amoral - so tagging one as "bad" and
> another as "good" goes against our purpose.

Well, in that case, the author of the revision is saying that "old" was 
bad so it changed it to "new", which it considered good.

However, that's not how it is showing. The "old" background is yellow, 
and the "new" one green. Red foreground is used *on both sides* to mark 
changed text.


_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to