Niklas Laxström wrote: > On 24 September 2011 00:49, Platonides wrote: >> Daniel Friesen wrote: >>> Does svn actually update disconnected svn directories that just happen >>> to be in a subdirectory? If it does do that then I do admit we might >>> want to provide a handy script to batch upgrade... well, actually >>> extension wise I've been thinking of that for extensions for awhile. >> >> I have heard of people doing that, and I assume that's what MaxSem means >> by 'svn trick', although I have been unable to make it myself. >> So if you can share the instructions, I would appreciate it. :) > > rm -rf extensions > svn co ..... extensions > > svn status should now show S extensions and you have all > extensions. If you don't want them all, use --depth empty and svn up > them individually.
Yes. I have done so, both with extensions a sparse checkout and with the folders their own checkouts inside extensions folder. What I mean is that a phase3 update doesn't seem to also update extensions. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
