I was looking into etherpad-lite as a possible basis for a service to help
with concurrent editing. Still haven't made a decision there whether it is a
good basis or if we should write our own (should we even want to do
concurrent editing).

I am told that etherpad-lite is a bit less stable than etherpad, but I'd
like to try running it ourselves to see for sure. The main benefit of
etherpad-lite is that it doesn't run in a byzantine Java-based JavaScript
environment kludged together in 2008; it's much more modern. So there are
fewer things for us to comprehend, if we want to get serious about such
kinds of services.

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Roan Kattouw <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Thomas Gries <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I just do not know, whether you have read about ETHERPAD LITE
> >
> > https://github.com/Pita/etherpad-lite/wiki
> >
> > It needs only a fraction of the resources of Etherpad.
> >
> I believe Neil Kandalgaonkar was working with the Etherpad Lite devs
> at some point to... do some thing cool. I forget what.
>
> Roan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to