Olivier Beaton <olivier.bea...@gmail.com> writes: >> Could you elaborate on that? > > Given that I wasn't using the GPL, I was concerned that anyone > committing against my code would do so under "all rights reserved" and > would effectively be forking my code from the point of their revision. > I wanted to make sure the code stayed under my BSD-2-Clause license.
I'm pretty confused by this whole situation. IANAL, but if you add restrictions such that you require modifications to be under the BSD-2-Clause license, then it seems like you have re-invented dual-licensing with the GPL license without any real benefit. If that is the case, I am not in favor of adding yet-another-licensing-scheme to our repository. But I could be swayed, given the right argument. What is the pragmatic benefit of your proposed license? Mark. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
