On 11/13/11 6:46 PM, Platonides wrote:
> On 13/11/11 01:44, William Allen Simpson wrote:
>> On 11/12/11 6:45 PM, Platonides wrote:
>>> When users get a message on their commons talk page, they will receive
>>> an email informing of that.
>>
>> In my personal experience, that's only true for the *first* message.  If
>> you don't check Talk after that, then you don't get any more emails.
>>
>> In my case, the first message was a welcome.  I didn't need to see the
>> welcome.  My guess is other more casual users don't bother either, so
>> they won't see any deletion messages.
>
> How did you know it was a welcome message? And why were you so sure that
> you didn't need to read it (you know, that welcome message actually
> includes useful information) and it was ok to ignore its content and
> further ones?
>
As an example, back in July 2009, my first Talk email (from meta) was
rather obviously a Welcome message:

# This is a new page.
#
# Editor's summary: Welcome!
#

When my Talk email showed up from trwiki in August 2009, I'm only
guessing it was a welcome message:

$ Yeni bir sayfa.
$
$ Açıklaması: Vikipedi'ye hoş geldiniz!
$
I could be wrong.  I'm also pretty sure I could not read it for that
"useful information." :-)

The email notifications were enabled on enwiki more recently in May 2011
(according to its footer/signature section).  I don't know about commons,
as the footer doesn't say.

What commons (and meta) do say in the body (different from enwiki):

# There will be no other notifications in case of further changes unless
# you visit this page.
# You could also reset the notification flags for all your watched pages
# on your watchlist.
#

That's the reason we need a special flag to override.

What mechanism would be best?


>> I suggested there be a special flag to force the sending of a message.
>> AFAICT, that's also the gist of jeblad's:
>>
>>       Add a magic word to enforce "enotif" on specific templates and the
>>       whole process shold be a lot more easy to handle than today. [sic]
>>
>> I'm also suggesting we add phone numbers and SMS.  Although I live on
>> email, I've found the younger set live on their phones a bit more than
>> we expected designing SMS long ago.
>
> I think with smartphones the trend is now getting things on the phone
> from the internet. Still, I don't oppose giving the option to send a sms
> on each talk page. Specially if you volunteer to pay that :)
> Doesn't seem too bad for commons: 600 talk page messages/day*. I would
> have expected something like the 9217 on enwiki.
>
> * Not really averaged, just today values:
>    select count(*) from revision join page on (rev_page=page_id) where
> page_namespace =2 and rev_timestamp LIKE '20111113%';
>
Hey, that could be "unlimited" texting for only $9.99 per month. ;-)


>>> That requires that they provided an email address on registration (it's
>>> optional) and verified it (really easy).
>>> Also, they shouldn't have the preference disabled (I think it has been
>>> on by default for new users since several years).
>>>
>>>
>>>> An email that pages have changed would be good.  Wikia sends it weekly.
>>>
>>> That would be email notification for all watchlist items. The load
>>> produced by enabling such option could be pondered.
>>
>> Sure, but the old default was to add each page you created to your
>> watch list.  My guess is there are few folks with massive watchlists.
>
> If it wasn't on by default, those people you are defending wouldn't have
> those pages on their watchlist.
>
True.  And the deletionists would still assume the lack of response
meant they were vandals.


>>> Note they can also subscribe to an RSS feed of their watchlist (this
>>> probably needs more publcity).
>>>
>> Yeah, I'd never heard of it.
>
> Ideas on where to publicise that are welcome. The first location I think
> is to add that somewhere on that welcome message you didn't read... :\
>

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to