On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Asher Feldman <[email protected]> wrote: > That page wasn't suitable for high volume public consumption (very > expensive db query + not properly cached), so the site problem persisted > even after the db initially suspected as bad was rotated out. > What happened to it? When this page was introduced, it did have proper caching in memcached. Was that removed? Or did we get a cache stampede?
Roan _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
