Hi Chad, Reposurgeon (http://catb.org/~esr/reposurgeon/ ) might be a useful tool to help fix the svn history.
Best, Diederik On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Couple of caveats (things I'm gonna try and fix): > > * Permissions aren't sorted yet, so it's only supporting anonymous > clones, > > no pushing yet. > > * The revision graph is crazy. svn:mergeinfo is unreliable and we're > pretty > > much unable to build a cohesive history without a *lot* of manual labor. > Right > > now I'm thinking of just dropping the mergeinfo so the branches look > like linear > > graphs cherry picking from master. Not perfect, but less annoying than > now. > > > > Also there's two stupid commits at the head of master due to my > mistake when initially pushing the repo. That won't happen again > on subsequent tests or the real conversion. > > -Chad > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
