Jay Ashworth <[email protected]> writes: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Dan Collins" <[email protected]> > >> On Bugzilla, bugs which are minor enhancements should not be tagged >> "highest" priority unless the priority is truly highest. This should >> certainly not be done en masse without personally reviewing the bug >> itself. Technological fact is not subject to democracy. > > On my Bugzilla installations, the Severity is owned by the reporter, but the > Priority by the assignee; this seems the best approach to me...
I agree. This is how I have been handling it. I leave Severity alone. Priority defaults to unprioritized. I make a first pass at prioritization with most things going into "Normal". I think we have a pretty good handle on things in the "Highest" priority, but with recent activity and the limited prioritization I've done while on my break, there are too many things in "Highest" now. I will cull the list on Tuesday, but if anyone wants to take a shot now, be my guest. (Still to discuss: How do I/we handle "High" priority bugs?) Mark _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
