On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Brion Vibber <[email protected]> wrote: > To a certain degree, I'd actually consider it desirable to have a permanent > 'slush' to the extent that destabilizing work should *always* be talked out > a bit and tested before it lands on trunk/head/master. >
+100 > If we're not ready to go fully git the instant we branch 1.19, we may wish > to consider applying more formal review to things proposed to go into trunk > on SVN. This may be simpler than attempting to synchronize SVN and git via > post-SVN-pre-git reviews... > I'm inclined to agree here too. -Chad _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
