Rob Lanphier wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Rob Lanphier <[email protected]> wrote: >> * Code review is falling back behind. As of right now, we have 38 >> unreviewed revisions in core (phase3), and another 189 unreviewed >> revisions in extensions. That's up from the 4 core + 28 extensions on >> February 4. We basically let code review get back out of hand as >> we've turned our focus toward bugfixing in deployment. > > That was last week. This week, it's even more grim: > * New (unreviewed): > ** core: 49 > ** extensions: 242 > * Fixme: > ** core: 8 > ** extensions: 19 > > The graph: http://toolserver.org/~robla/crstats/ > > The trendline doesn't look good. What can we do to get back on the right > track?
With what percent of time devoted to code review? There's a 20% rule, isn't there? Is that being followed? Is the percent higher? Lower? That's surely a useful metric when looking at a problem like this. Because code review is ultimately about... doing code review. wikitech-l has no secret answer. MZMcBride _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
