On Mar 22, 2012 3:44 PM, "Rob Lanphier" <[email protected]> wrote: > Another possible plan would be to have something *somewhat* closer to > what we have today, with new branches off of trunk for each > deployment, and deployments happening as frequently as weekly. > > master > ├── 1.20wmf01 > ├── 1.20wmf02 > ├── 1.20wmf03 > ... > ├── 1.20wmf11 > ├── 1.20wmf12 > ├── REL1_20 > ├── 1.21wmf01 > ├── 1.21wmf02 > ├── 1.21wmf03 > ... > > This is how I was envisioning the process working, and just didn't get > a chance to sync up with Chad to find out what the issues of this > approach would be. > This seems like the best approach to me, because it meshes with het deploy better, as described by others on this thread. However, I'd recommend using a naming convention with a prefix, e.g. wmf/1.20/01 , so we can handle permissions on these deployment branches in a managable way.
Roan _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
