It's possible someone make extension which contains Code in name, so I
think it would be best to use the full name of extension

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Chad <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Petr Bena <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I think we should create a page describing standards for names of keys
>> in preferences and database objects for extensions. I propose to make
>> it standard to prefix all keys in $preferences array with the name of
>> extensions at least or some other words maybe (e_ExtensionName_Value
>> ?).
>>
>> The same should apply for database objects like tables. The main
>> reason for this is to avoid collision given that we already have lot
>> of extensions. What do you think?
>>
>
> For database tables, I think as long as you're consistent
> within an extension, the prefix can be anything that makes
> sense.
>
> For example, in CodeReview we use code_* for our table
> names.
>
> -Chad
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to