Yes, Microsoft was great when they made IE 6, but when IE 7 came out, Microsoft killed the Internet star. I mean, HTML 5? What? I read a book that said after HTML 4.01, it would be XHTML 1.0, XHTML 1.1 ... not HTML 5! Tyler Z On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:45:20 +0200, Andre Engels wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Chad <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Absolutely not. We have debated the "show notice to broken browsers" >>thing multiple times--and the answer is always "it's annoying as hell >>when sites do it and it's not our place to do so." >> >>The stance on "supporting crappy old browsers" has largely over time >>turned into--continue supporting all browsers with at least 1% of our >>readers (roughly,I don't believe that number's ever been set in stone). >>Once they are less than 1%, continue supporting unless it's a burden >>to do so and/or makes support for newer browsers impossible. And lastly, >>never purposefully break a browser if you can help it. > >Just to give some data: Looking at May, this 1% limit would mean >supporting the following browser versions (May 2012 data): > >* Chrome 18.0 and 19.0 >* MSIE 6.0, 7.0, 8.0 and 9.0 >* Firefox 3.6, 11.0 and 12.0 >* Safari 534.55 (desktop), 6533.18 and 7534.48 (iOS) >* Opera 11.62 and 11.64 >* Safari 533.1 (Android browser) > >Furthermore, the following have no version at or over 1%, but do get >there or at least near when all versions are combined: >* Opera Mini >* WikipediaMobile (our own mobile app) >* BlackBerry browser >* Apple PubSub (rss reader) > >-- >André Engels, [email protected] > >_______________________________________________ >Wikitech-l mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
