On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Brion Vibber <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Platonides <[email protected]> wrote: > > > My concern are images inside articles, where a big screen user will want > > |500px but a small screen one |120px. > > Maybe we should move to a size specification dependant on the > clientWidth. > > > > That's really a separate issue, which is that a large portion of image uses > in content should probably be changed; trade hardcoded sizes for galleries > and priority markers, perhaps. And of course replace the crappy old > link-to-image-page with a sensible click-to-zoom. I had once talked about this (click-to-zoom) feature on wikimedia sites in irc. Wikipedia could have something similar to sites like Facebook or Google+ where the images float over the page. I have tried an extension FancyBoxThumbs<http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:FancyBoxThumbs> which enables such a feature, with some enhancements it can be more awesome. -- Cheers, Nischay Nahata _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
