On 20/06/12 17:28, Tim Weyer (SVG) wrote:
> 'deleterevision' in its function of deleting revisions of a page or
> removing IP/username/comment is what I want it to be only. And if you
> tell it masking or suppressing is not a big difference. Okay, you only
> suppress the content of the log entry, so you mask it. But I know what
> I'm speaking about.
> If you wouldn't have 'deleterevision' permission, you would have to
> delete and undelete the page without the revision(s) you wanted to
> remove. If you have 'deleterevision' permission, you can easily remove
> the content (and the comment if needed; and if you want to remove the
> editor's name, you can do it too).
> 
> Masking log entries is another part and that's why I want to give it an
> extra permission called 'suppresslogentry'. You could also name it
> 'hidelogentry', but I think we should use it because of
> 'suppressrevision'. This permission's name does also include 'suppress'
> in its name even you can only hide log entries and revisions for
> administrators too.

Sébastien reply seemed to refer to the other.
I think it's fine to make the separation you propose. Please open a bug
for that if one doesn't already exist.


_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to