On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Marcin Cieslak <[email protected]> wrote:
As seen on IRC:
https://github.com/ooyala/barkeep/wiki/Comparing-Barkeep-to-other-code-review-tools
The most prominent feature of Barkeep mentioned on this page is that
it was built for a post-commit review workflow. Given that the reason
we moved MediaWiki to git was basically so that we could move *away*
from post-commit review, I don't think using Barkeep as-is would work.
Then again, from watching the demo video (see getbarkeep.org) it looks
I assumed it was pre-commit workflow only when I first looked at
Barkeep, but I found this snippet on getbarkeep.org that Roan posted.
"Barkeep is unopinionated. Use it with pre-commit or post-commit
workflows, and script tools on top of it if you like. Comes with a
command line client and REST APIs."
Subbu.
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
