On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Krinkle <[email protected]> wrote: > Replies inline: > > On Jun 28, 2012, at 7:38 PM, Jon Robson wrote: > >> # "things rely on those inline styles whether we like it or not." >> No... They rely on styles not //inline// styles. This is my main >> problem with the current setup! I believe the majority of things done >> in inline styles that are essential would be better done in >> MediaWiki:Common.css - if we have text that is red this would be >> better down with a class markedRed otherwise some text risks being red >> or and other text #BE3B3B despite meaning the same thing. Most layout >> problems on mobile can be fixed with media queries. You can't do these >> in inline styles. >> > > Hold on, we're in misunderstanding :). We agree. > > So, they *do* rely on inline styles. But when I said "they rely" I meant: they > currently use them to do something that should not be removed. You won't hear > me > say we "need" inline styles (there is not a single layout best done through > inline styles). I'm saying they are in use - right now - and fulfilling valid > needs to the point that they can break or make an article. > > Obviously they should become css classes loaded through modules like > MediaWiki:Common.css and what not. I will +1 any movement towards deprecating > them entirely from wikitext in MediaWii core. But not for just for mobile and > not without at least a year of migration time for live sites (possibly with an > opt-in feature before that for users to preview articles without inline styles > to help fixing them).
Yes, please, because fixing things such as (put your sunglasses first) https://pt.wikipedia.org/?oldid=30926886&action=edit§ion=3&preview=yes&uselang=en is a PITA and will take years! (there are tons of it!) Best regards, Helder _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
