On 11 July 2012 14:16, Andre Klapper <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 09:23 -0700, Rob Lanphier wrote:
>> I've dabbled with the idea of turning "upstream" into a state,
>> actually, since the state is often inconsistent (sometimes it stays
>> open, sometimes its "resolved/later"), and it's not entirely clear
>> what it should be.  Another solution would be a resolution code (e.g.
>> "resolved/filed-upstream")
>
> +1.
> KDE Bugzilla uses "RESOLVED UPSTREAM" for such cases,
> Mer Project uses "RESOLVED TRIAGEDUPSTREAM" for such cases.

I'm okay with state, but not at all with resolution code. From the
reporters perspective the issue is not fixed when it is reported
upstream. For example if our Gerrit is broken, the issue not resolved
until a fix is applied in our installation.
  -Niklas

-- 
Niklas Laxström

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to