On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 01:42 -0400, Tyler Romeo wrote: > I think this is a great idea, but I also have a new idea for how we might > go about using the RESOLVED -> VERIFIED -> CLOSED workflow in BugZilla, > rather than just treating resolved as closed. One thing I noticed about MW > is that we're very much lacking in the test planning area. What if a bug is > marked as verified if either a) somebody makes and commits a test case for > it or b) it is determined that a test case is not applicable. That way > we'll have automated tests ensuring every bug we fix doesn't come back > again. Any thoughts?
I fail to see a strong relation with the VERIFIED status. One could also argue in favor of writing a testcase together with writing the fix for a specific bug report (so relating it to RESOLVED FIXED instead). But this is getting off-topic for the "bug triage" subject anyway. :) andre -- Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster & GNOME Bugsquad) http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
