>>>> On 09/20/2012 04:34 PM, dan entous wrote:
>>>> dear all,
>>>> 
>>>> as some of you may already know, the GLAMwiki Toolset Project, 
>>>> http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Toolset_project, is a 
>>>> collaboration between Wikimedia Nederland, Wikimedia UK, Wikimedia France 
>>>> and Europeana, with the goal of providing a set of tools to get materials 
>>>> from GLAM institutions onto Wikimedia Commons in a way that reuse can 
>>>> easily be tracked, and that Commons materials can easily be integrated 
>>>> back into the collection of the original GLAM or even other GLAMs.
>>>> 
>>>> as part of our initial goal of creating a GLAM Upload System, we are 
>>>> looking to gather Wikimedia community input on the proposed architecture 
>>>> and technologies. if you have time and interest, please take a look and 
>>>> let us know your thoughts, 
>>>> http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Toolset_project/Request_for_Comments/Technical_Architecture.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> with kind regards,
>>>> dan
>>> 
>>> On Sep 24, 2012, at 9:54 PM, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
>>> Hi Dan,
>>> 
>>> I have a few questions about the choice of the Zend Framework:
>>> * Why exactly using the Zend Framework?
>> would like to use an open-source mvc framework that is used widely, has 
>> strong community support, and several modules that may be used for current 
>> and future development rather than develop or use a custom or less widely 
>> used mvc framework
>> 
>>> * Do we really need such a dependency?
>> the code will be dependent on some type of mvc framework - either custom, 
>> less or widely used
>> 
>>> * Do we have this framework installed on the Wikimedia servers?
>> not sure, but the gwtoolset will be used on a wikimedia labs instance, not 
>> on a wikimedia server. the gwtoolset will have a browser ui that allows 
>> glams to upload their metadata, match it to mediawiki templates and then 
>> upload the result to commons.wikimedia.org using the mediawiki api
> 
> I thought the lab instance was only an incubation environment and that the 
> final goal was to put gwtoolset on the WMF prod. servers. Isn't it?
the final goal, as far as i understand it, is to have it run as its own 
application in its own environment, similar to the way some applications are 
running on the current toolserver. i was told that instead of using the 
toolserver we should use a wikimedia labs instance. would love to hear if this 
is not the intended outcome.

> Emmanuel


_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to