On Sep 29, 2012, at 4:51 AM, Daniel Friesen <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, multiselect is a VERY bad usability choice. Frankly we shouldn't use it anywhere. If we're using JS to make > a better UI it would actually be much better to output usable checkboxes and then turn the checkboxes into a > special JS multi-select. Instead of outputting an unusable multi-select and compensating for it.
> Sure, as long as there is JS available we should turn the multi-select into something nicer. But the original idea behind this was that a multi select would still be more user friendly than an endless list of check-boxes when having around 300 choices (e.g. for languages). Take jQuery chosen for example (thanks for the link Yury), it takes a multi-select as source and turns it into some very nice piece of UI. It doesn't matter whether you originally have a bunch of check-boxes or a multi-select from a JS perspective. Anyhow, I would still appreciate if someone would merge the thing, it's sitting around for too long already and it seems that it got stuck because of some very minor issue once again: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/8924/ Thanks! -- Daniel Werner Software Engineer Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Obentrautstr. 72 | 10963 Berlin Tel. (030) 219 158 26-0 http://wikimedia.de Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
