"Daniel Friesen" <[email protected]> wrote: >> is there a recommended work flow for bugfixing?
>> Right now what I do is submit a patch to gerrit and, if I remember, set >> some tag in bugzilla. At some point somebody approves and merges the >> patch. Then, if I remember, I set the bug to resolved/fixed in bugzilla. >> There is a bit too much remembering involved for my taste. It's easy to >> forget to close the bug in bugzilla, especially if the patch has been >> lying around for some time before being merged. >> Would it be possible/sensible to automatically close a bug when the >> patch is merged? Or did I miss something? > That would require two things: > A) Far more integration between Gerrit and Bugzilla than we currently have. > B) An assumption that every commit that mentions a bug actually fixes it. > And I really don't like the idea of B. I can easily see > people mentioning bugs that are related to a commit in the > commit message but not directly fixed by it. Then why did you invent B only to rail against it? Just use a reasonable pattern, e. g. "This fixes bug #(\d+)\." Tim _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
