On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Brad Jorsch <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Chad <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Amir E. Aharoni >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> At another commit I made once (forgot which one) somebody commented >>> that I shouldn't have updated the release notes and that this should >>> only be done by the release manager, because this helps avoid merge >>> conflicts and because the release manager has better judgment about >>> which issues are important enough to be mentioned there. >>> >> >> You *should* update release notes. This statement about having the >> release manager do all release notes is incorrect. > > I've never heard that "release manager" claim either. > > The current "word" on release notes seems to be at > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/CC#Release_notes, which says "All > significant changes to the core software which might affect wiki > users, server administrators, or extension authors, must be documented > in the RELEASE-NOTES file." I've been interpreting that as including > pretty much any bug that was reported by a wiki user. >
Indeed. That's always been the case. -Chad _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
