On 11/21/2012 05:18 PM, sankarshan wrote:
QA activity days often lead to a large number of duplicate issues
being filed. The bugmaster (I'm assuming this is Andre) should
probably have a say in whether there is capacity built in to handle
de-duplication either manually or, automatically.
It's not coincidence that the proposal puts bug triaging activities at
the same level than testing activities. Volunteers can help, and a lot,
dealing with the long tail of Bugzilla reports that fully dedicated
teams have no time to go through.
The other thought I had was about the layered personas being created
for the team. Since Chris points out later in this thread that QA is a
relatively "new concept", being egalitarian would have a much higher
chance at a larger percentage of committed members of a QA group.
Sorry, I don't understand this paragraph.
Just in case: in the proposal there are some profiles and roles
identified, with the simple purpose of agreeing what kind of people we
are looking for and how do we expect them (us) to interact and
collaborate with each other beyond the pure tasks of testing or bug
triaging.
--
Quim Gil
Technical Contributor Coordinator
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
