Nemo
_______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
And to be more explicit, quoting the paper in case someone really has
doubts: «we deem a captcha scheme broken when the attacker is able to
reach a precision of at least 1%». With our FancyCaptcha we are/were at
25 % precision for attackers, so yes, it's officially broken, and it's
been so since more than a year ago
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.technical/56387>
so surely spammers got better in the meanwhile.
- Re: [Wikitech-l] Why are we still using ... Bawolff Bawolff
- Re: [Wikitech-l] Why are we still using ... Chris Grant
- [Wikitech-l] Why are we still using cap... John Vandenberg
- Re: [Wikitech-l] Why are we still using ... Federico Leva (Nemo)
- Re: [Wikitech-l] Why are we still using ... Luke Welling WMF
- Re: [Wikitech-l] Why are we still using ... Helder .
- Re: [Wikitech-l] Why are we still using captchas on W... Chris Grant
- Re: [Wikitech-l] Why are we still using captchas on W... Bawolff Bawolff
- Re: [Wikitech-l] Why are we still using captchas... David Gerard
- Re: [Wikitech-l] Why are we still using capt... Federico Leva (Nemo)
