Huh! News to me as well. I definitely agree with that decision. Thanks, Ori!
I've already written the Varnish code for setting X-MF-Mode so it can be captured by varnishncsa. Is there agreement to switch to Mobile-Mode, or at least, MF-Mode? Looking especially to hear from Arthur and Matt. -- David Schoonover d...@wikimedia.org On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Diederik van Liere <dvanli...@wikimedia.org>wrote: > Thanks Ori, I was not aware of this > D > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2013-02-02, at 16:55, Ori Livneh <o...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On Saturday, February 2, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Platonides wrote: > > > >> I don't like it's cryptic nature. > >> > >> Someone looking at the headers sent to his browser would be very > >> confused about what's the point of «X-MF-Mode: b». > >> > >> Instead something like this would be much more descriptive: > >> X-Mobile-Mode: stable > >> X-Mobile-Request: secondary > >> > >> But that also means sending more bytes through the wire :S > > Well, you can (and should) drop the 'X-' :-) > > > > See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648: Deprecating the "X-" Prefix and > Similar Constructs in Application Protocols > > > > > > -- > > Ori Livneh > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
