If you mean that we have to insert that huge chunk of comments from
[1] into every page, the answer is no because we'll have to include
several licenses here, making it ridiculously long. All JS run on
Wikimedia sites is free, and if some software believes otherwise, that
software needs to be fixed.


-----
[1] http://www.gnu.org/software/librejs/free-your-javascript.html


On 05.03.2013, 15:56 Alexander wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256

> GNU LibreJS blocks several Javascript sources around Wikipedia. I was
> sent to this list by Kirk Billund. My issue as well as Kirk's replies
> follows. I hope you are okay to read it in this form.

> 03/05/2013 11:16 - Alexander Berntsen wrote:
>>>>> GNU LibreJs[0] reports that several of the Javascript sources
>>>>> embedded by different parts of Wikipedia are proprietary[1].
>>>>> Is this a conscious anti-social choice[2], or have you merely
>>>>> not set up your source files to properly show their
>>>>> licence[3]?
>>>>> 
>>>>> If the latter is the case, please remedy this. If the former
>>>>> is the case... please remedy this. It is extremely
>>>>> important.[4] In any event I hope to get a reply, as the
>>>>> distinction is important to me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> [0]  https://www.gnu.org/software/librejs/ [1]
>>>>> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware
>>>>>
>>>>> 
> [2]  https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/javascript-trap.html
>>>>> [3]
>>>>> https://www.gnu.org/software/librejs/free-your-javascript.html
>>>>>
>>>>> 
> [4]  https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-free.html


-- 
Best regards,
  Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])


_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to