On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Rob Lanphier <[email protected]> wrote:
> As near as I can tell from a quick skim of the changeset you're > referencing, Aaron's changes here are purely additive. Am I reading > this wrong? Is there some other changeset that changes/removes > existing interfaces that you meant to reference instead? > At first glance it seems additive, but the change adds a new abstract method to the JobQueue class, meaning any child class of JobQueue that doesn't have the new method implemented will trigger a fatal error. To make it not breaking, the function would have to have a default implementation in the main JobQueue class. *--* *Tyler Romeo* Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015 Major in Computer Science www.whizkidztech.com | [email protected] _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
