On 03/07/2013 03:02 PM, Antoine Musso wrote:
> Le 06/03/13 22:05, Robert Rohde a écrit :
>> On enwiki we've already made Lua conversions with most of the string
>> templates, several formatting templates (e.g. {{rnd}}, {{precision}}),
>> {{coord}}, and a number of others. And there is work underway on a
>> number of the more complex overhauls (e.g. {{cite}}, {{convert}}).
>> However, it would be nice to identify problematic templates that may
>> be less obvious.
>
> You can get in touch with Brad Jorsch and Tim Starling. They most
> probably have a list of templates that should quickly converted to LUA
> modules.
>
> If we got {{cite}} out, that will be already a nice improvement :-]
Thanks for this thread. :-) I used some links from it in
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/03/11/lua-templates-faster-more-flexible-pages/
.
There are suggestions on
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lua_requests for templates to be
converted; I'm not sure how other wikis are categorizing or listing
their most inefficient templates. Thank you for
https://svn.wikimedia.org/svnroot/pywikipedia/trunk/pywikipedia/parserfunctioncount.py
, Bináris.
You can use using Anomie’s Greasemonkey script to more easily see the
performance gains:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anomie/PP-report-Greasemonkey-script
--
Sumana Harihareswara
Engineering Community Manager
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
