On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Isarra Yos <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/04/13 20:48, Matthew Flaschen wrote: > >> On 04/03/2013 03:30 AM, Ori Livneh wrote: >> >>> That seems wrong. Of the two, MediaWiki.org is clearly the more >>> successful wiki. It is larger by all measures, and draws a wide pool >>> of active contributors. >>> >> I don't know that it's appropriate to put WMF-only stuff on the >> MediaWiki site. Of course, I'm not totally convinced merging the other >> way is a good idea other. Although there's overlap between MW proper >> and the WMF tech, we have to remember they're distinct. >> > > I know some of WMF-specific stuff would still be useful to others trying > to do similar - things like server setup, installation issues, > configuration and good practices and whatnot comes to mind. Having examples > of what others have done - mostly Wikimedia and ShoutWiki in my case - > proved invaluable when I was setting up my own wikifamily-like thing, at > least, but they weren't exactly easy to find. > > Wikimedia's configuration isn't specified on MediaWiki.org. It's on wikitech already. The docs you are referring to are non-wikimedia configuration examples provided by MediaWiki users, and that stuff will stay there. - Ryan _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
