Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
>On 04/06/2013 09:16 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
>> By the way, it would be lovely not to call communication like
>> nationalization... sometimes I see people coming to communities saying
>> they're socializing something and it feels weird. ;-) (Especially as
>> it's false good news.)
>> 
>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/socialize
>>      (transitive) To take into collective or governmental ownership
>> 
>> Nemo
>
>Nemo, I have sympathy for you here -- it took a while for me to get
>used to the use of "socialize" in the way the Wikimedia communities use
>it. [...]

I don't have much sympathy. Looking at
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/socialization>:

---
1. The process of learning one's culture
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/culture> and how to live within it.

2. The act of interacting with others, of being social.

3. Taking under government control as implementing socialism.
---

Given the precedence here (the definition having to do with governments
and socialism is third), I don't think it's very reasonable to call the
usage within Wikimedia wrong or even noteworthy.

My local dictionary (New Oxford American Dictionary) also lists the
socialism definition third.

So, yes, if you choose to ignore the primary and secondary definitions,
the tertiary definition isn't a great fit. This is why it's the tertiary
definition, of course.

MZMcBride



_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to