Hi, Is there any written policy about the review-process for Gadgets?
For Extensions I found a document, that says an Extension should: get a design review, be internationalized, get a code review and finally get a deployment review. [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Writing_an_extension_for_deployment]
I can't find any rules like this for Gadgets, but I see lot's of Gadgets set default in several Wikis. I think Gadgets can be designed badly and have security flaws as well as Extensions… so there shouldn't there exists some review process?
best regards, Lukas _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
