On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Petr Onderka <[email protected]> wrote:
> I didn't necessarily mean that the 100-Continue workflow should be fully > supported. > I think Ignoring the header would be much better than completely refusing > to work with it (and replying with error 417) and my guess is that doing > that should be possible. > > Looking at the HTTP specification [1], it says that a proxy *has to* return > 417 if the target server doesn't support HTTP/1.1. > Though I have no idea why would the specification require this. > So you're suggesting we go *against* the HTTP standard? That's not exactly what you're supposed to do. *-- * *Tyler Romeo* Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015 Major in Computer Science www.whizkidztech.com | [email protected] _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
