Hi Oren, Thanks for the feedback.
If I have got your point correctly, then the browser extensions would not impact or slow down the page loading. My project scope does include on demand loading of the input methods, but I am not very sure how to go about integrating Resource Loader with the browser extensions. As far as I know, Resource Loader can only be used on MediaWiki enabled websites whereas the project aims at providing these input methods on any website. Let me know what you think of it. Regards, Praveen Singh On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:15 PM, oren bochman <orenboch...@gmail.com> wrote: > Interesting proposal. > > I would imagine that this does not impact most page-views since Js files > are cached. > > It might be better to fix this bug by a tighter integration of the > JavaScript with the Resource loader to lazy load the required elements as > needed > > In such a case the solution would be less dependent on browser plugins and > Would require less long term maintenance when the Js is updated > > On Apr 29, 2013, at 12:09, Praveen Singh <prag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I have drafted a proposal for my GSoC Project: jQuery.IME extensions for > > Firefox and Chrome. I would love to hear what you think about it. > > I would really appreciate any kind of feedback and suggestions. Please > let > > me know if I can improve it in any way. > > > > My proposal can be found here: > > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Prageck/GSoC_2013_Application > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Praveen Singh > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
