Zeljiko,
I have updated my proposal with your suggestions, plus added a timeline and more info under "About Me". Let me know if you have other suggestions. Here is my update proposal for OPW: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Rachel99/OPW_proposal Thank you. -Rachel On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Rachel Thomas <[email protected]>wrote: > Here is my proposal for OPW: > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Rachel99/OPW_proposal > Hi Rachel, I have left a couple of comments on the talk page[1]. Željko -- 1: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Rachel99/OPW_proposal >________________________________ > From: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 12:38 PM >Subject: Wikitech-l Digest, Vol 118, Issue 34 > > >Send Wikitech-l mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > >You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Wikitech-l digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: OPW Browser Test Automation - Proposal Summary > (Željko Filipin) > 2. Re: OPW browser test automation for Visual Editor > (Željko Filipin) > 3. Re: APIStrat conference, San Francisco, October 23, 24, 25 > (Marc A. Pelletier) > 4. How to get permission to view deleted revision information > via API? (Claudia Müller-Birn) > 5. Re: How to get permission to view deleted revision > information via API? (Chad) > 6. Re: GSoC / OPW mentors README (Quim Gil) > 7. Re: APIStrat conference, San Francisco, October 23, 24, 25 > (Mathieu Stumpf) > 8. Re: GLAM Wiki Toolset code review (Sumana Harihareswara) > 9. Git for idiots (Petr Bena) > 10. Re: Git for idiots (Chad) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 14:42:22 +0200 >From: Željko Filipin <[email protected]> >To: Wikimedia developers <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] OPW Browser Test Automation - Proposal > Summary >Message-ID: > <cabfbeaohs5ruweptarpz6yu1aorkvoqhaxenzhva2wlggyc...@mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Indrani Sen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am summarizing here my proposal idea for OPW MediaWiki projects. > > >I have noticed that you did not provide the link to your proposal[1]. In >addition to the comments that I have posted here, I have left a few >comments on the talk page[2]. > >Željko >-- >1: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Indranisen >2: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Indranisen > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 14:57:10 +0200 >From: Željko Filipin <[email protected]> >To: Rachel Thomas <[email protected]>, Wikimedia developers > <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] OPW browser test automation for Visual > Editor >Message-ID: > <CABfBeArREv5M6y22igQYCnNXB9GWjh=dswo-etzk0scb0+5...@mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Rachel Thomas ><[email protected]>wrote: > >> Here is my proposal for OPW: >> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Rachel99/OPW_proposal >> > >Hi Rachel, > >I have left a couple of comments on the talk page[1]. > >Željko >-- >1: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Rachel99/OPW_proposal > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 3 >Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 09:09:17 -0400 >From: "Marc A. Pelletier" <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] APIStrat conference, San Francisco, October > 23, 24, 25 >Message-ID: <[email protected]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >On 05/07/2013 05:33 PM, Juliusz Gonera wrote: >> Seems interesting. Is there anyone who'd be interested in giving a talk >> or participating in a panel there? > >Given that it's very close to me, and that I have quite a bit of >experience with the API, this is something I could do. > >I actually had an API talk planned for WM 2012 that I never got a chance >to present, I could dust it off and see how well it fits in their scope. >Do you know when their CFP opens? > >-- Marc > > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 4 >Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 15:35:19 +0200 >From: Claudia Müller-Birn <[email protected]> >To: Wikimedia developers <[email protected]> >Subject: [Wikitech-l] How to get permission to view deleted revision > information via API? >Message-ID: <[email protected]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > >Hi all, > >I don't know whether this is the correct mailing list to ask such question but >it is the one I am reading regularly… > >Does anyone know about the adequate procedure to get permission to request >deleted revision information from the MediaWiki API? > >I just stumbled over this problem... > >{ > "servedby": "mw1140", > "error": { > "code": "drpermissiondenied", > "info": "You don't have permission to view deleted revision >information" > } >} > >Many thanks. > >Best, Claudia > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 5 >Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 09:46:35 -0400 >From: Chad <[email protected]> >To: Wikimedia developers <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] How to get permission to view deleted > revision information via API? >Message-ID: > <cadn73rnf5p6p2fwkqe20ezagxmbfokq1n+r16jd6-vngagc...@mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Claudia Müller-Birn ><[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I don't know whether this is the correct mailing list to ask such question >> but it is the one I am reading regularly… >> >> Does anyone know about the adequate procedure to get permission to request >> deleted revision information from the MediaWiki API? >> >> I just stumbled over this problem... >> >> { >> "servedby": "mw1140", >> "error": { >> "code": "drpermissiondenied", >> "info": "You don't have permission to view deleted revision >>information" >> } >> } >> > >For a personal wiki, this means you need the 'deletedhistory' and 'deletedtext' >permissions (which is by default assigned to the admin group). > >On WMF wikis, this requires being an administrator (although I think there's >some exception for researchers handed out via Meta). > >-Chad > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 6 >Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 07:41:18 -0700 >From: Quim Gil <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] GSoC / OPW mentors README >Message-ID: <[email protected]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > >On 05/03/2013 04:22 PM, Matthew Flaschen wrote: >> On 04/27/2013 07:58 PM, Quim Gil wrote: >>> SELECTING CANDIDATES >>> >>> After the deadline we will meet to prioritize GSoC and OPW candidates. >> >> When is this meeting? > >It seems that we won't need a meeting to discuss candidates. So far the >discussions of the proposals in Google Melange are enough. > >What we will do is a hangout for mentors next week to discuss anything >except candidates: questions about the program and your work, >expectations, tips & tricks... > >And some questions that came from a student: > >> 1. May I know how selection of the most suitable candidate for each >> GSoC project will be like? > >It is described at >https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Mentorship_programs/Selection_process but >if anybody has more specific questions just ask. > >> 2. Would it depend on technical knowledge and research? > >It's a combination of many factors. There is a short term question (do >we trust this candidate can complete this project) and a mid term >question (do we believe this candidate will stick around, contributing >after the internship?). > >There is no scientific way to predict the answers. Own initiative, >social/communication skills or personal context may play a role as >important as the declared technical knowledge (which in many cases we >can't even evaluate properly because on many cases there is not much >code and history to look at - which is relatively expected in these >types of internship programs. > > >> 3. Will there be more than one successful candidate for one specific >> project or is it strictly the best (only one) candidate for the >> specific project? > >GSoC / OPW allow this, but we are aiming to have only one candidate per >project. The main motivation is to give more chances to more projects. >We try to define project ideas that can be accomplished by one person >during the internship. > >-- >Quim Gil >Technical Contributor Coordinator @ Wikimedia Foundation >http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 7 >Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 17:14:53 +0200 >From: Mathieu Stumpf <[email protected]> >To: Wikimedia developers <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] APIStrat conference, San Francisco, October > 23, 24, 25 >Message-ID: <[email protected]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > >Le mercredi 08 mai 2013 à 09:09 -0400, Marc A. Pelletier a écrit : >> On 05/07/2013 05:33 PM, Juliusz Gonera wrote: >> > Seems interesting. Is there anyone who'd be interested in giving a talk >> > or participating in a panel there? >> >> Given that it's very close to me, and that I have quite a bit of >> experience with the API, this is something I could do. >> >> I actually had an API talk planned for WM 2012 that I never got a chance >> to present, I could dust it off and see how well it fits in their scope. >> Do you know when their CFP opens? >> >> -- Marc > >Will the event be recorded and broadcasted? This may be an interesting >document to add on meta where efforts are done to make developers >involvement more attractive. > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikitech-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 8 >Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 12:23:30 -0400 >From: Sumana Harihareswara <[email protected]> >To: Wikimedia developers <[email protected]> >Cc: Geer Oskam <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] GLAM Wiki Toolset code review >Message-ID: <[email protected]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >On 04/17/2013 02:51 AM, Mathieu Stumpf wrote: >> Le 2013-04-16 18:25, Geer Oskam a écrit : >>> Hi all, >>> >>> the GLAM Wiki Toolset-code is ready for its initial review. >>> It can be found at: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/59405/ >>> >>> Please help us by taking a look at it. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Geer Oskam >>> >>> Europeana >> >> For those like me which are wondering "what is it?", here is an >> informative copy of the README: >> >> GWToolset >> ========= >> >> A MediWiki extension that allows GLAMs the ability to mass upload >> content based on an xml file conta >> ining respective metadata about the content. The intent is to allow for >> a variety of xml schemas; se >> e the [extension page]( >> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:GWToolset ) for further >> information. >> >> >> >> >> >> (All apologies if this was obvious to all other readers of this list) > >Thanks to Siebrand, Reedy, and Peachey88 for their reviews. There's a >new patchset up as of today in case anyone wants to take a fresh look. > >-- >Sumana Harihareswara >Engineering Community Manager >Wikimedia Foundation > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 9 >Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 18:34:15 +0200 >From: Petr Bena <[email protected]> >To: Wikimedia developers <[email protected]> >Subject: [Wikitech-l] Git for idiots >Message-ID: > <ca+4eq5f2dnbrgokxhg0jgpwgarcbtej8ikbktmv8wyaxmmx...@mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > >Hi, > >Long time ago when I started learning with git I decided to create a >simple guide (basically I was just taking some notes of what is >needed). I never thought that it could be useful to anyone so I never >announced it anywhere. However I got some feedback to it, so I decided >to inform you too. > >The basic idea is to create a TOTALLY SIMPLE guide that git >illiterates like me can understand and thanks to which they would find >out how to do stuff in wikimedia git / gerrit. > >Link is here: www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Petrb/Git_for_idiots > >It doesn't contain so much and there are some mistakes / feel free to fix them. > >Since wikimedia switched to gerrit from svn I have yet met a tons of >people who had problems adapting to it, so this could eventually help >some. > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 10 >Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 12:37:56 -0400 >From: Chad <[email protected]> >To: Wikimedia developers <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Git for idiots >Message-ID: > <cadn73rptpwanz7szxk3godshd5jb1tyafxkt778mbhda5-r...@mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Petr Bena <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Long time ago when I started learning with git I decided to create a >> simple guide (basically I was just taking some notes of what is >> needed). I never thought that it could be useful to anyone so I never >> announced it anywhere. However I got some feedback to it, so I decided >> to inform you too. >> >> The basic idea is to create a TOTALLY SIMPLE guide that git >> illiterates like me can understand and thanks to which they would find >> out how to do stuff in wikimedia git / gerrit. >> >> Link is here: www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Petrb/Git_for_idiots >> >> It doesn't contain so much and there are some mistakes / feel free to fix >> them. >> >> Since wikimedia switched to gerrit from svn I have yet met a tons of >> people who had problems adapting to it, so this could eventually help >> some. >> > >We've got [[Git/Workflow]], [[Git/Tutorial]] and [[Git/Getting >started]] (in decreasing >order of complexity/depth), so I would be hesitant to add yet another >howto page. >Considering this is supposed to be quick-and-easy docs, I'd suggest folding any >unique content into the getting started doc. > >-Chad > > > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Wikitech-l mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > >End of Wikitech-l Digest, Vol 118, Issue 34 >******************************************* > > > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
