I can see how memcached and redis would have similar performance for sessions. 
Is that also true for job queue? I was assuming that job queue could move from 
database to redis, but not to memcached. Is that a correct assumption?

The main reason I could see moving sessions into redis would be to not manage 
both redis and memcached, assuming that redis is the key to making the job 
queue faster. 

--
Jamie Thingelstad
[email protected]
mobile: 612-810-3699

On May 24, 2013, at 3:07 PM, Aaron Schulz <[email protected]> wrote:

> Note that if you already use memcached for the main cache, there isn't really
> any reason to switch to redis unless you need replication or persistence.
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to