BTW, that really should at least be mentioned in the footer of that page if you ask me. It seems at least parts of status.wikimedia.org are configurable in terms of styling, so perhaps the footer can be made to mention this.
Compared to the rest of our ecosystem, it might only have a few users, but we should get that covered in my opinion. I'm CC'ing legal, because I'm wondering what their opinion is. It is externals doing user tracking on a wmf domain after all. DJ On 27 mei 2013, at 08:44, MZMcBride <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter Kaminski wrote: >> <http://status.mozilla.com/> and <http://status.automattic.com/> use >> UA-230951-5 as well, along with sites such as <http://api-status.com/> >> and <http://worldcup2010.public-website-status.com/> (for instance). >> >> It looks like the Google Analytics code and UA-230951-5 is part of the >> CA Nimsoft Cloud Monitor system >> <http://www.nimsoft.com/solutions/nimsoft-cloud-user-experience/key-featur >> es/public-status-page.html>, >> which "powers" public status pages. Check the page source or scroll to >> the bottom for the credits link. > > That's great. Thanks for finding that. I updated > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Google_Analytics> accordingly. > > MZMcBride > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
