On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Thomas Gries <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am 04.07.2013 04:19, schrieb Matthew Flaschen: > >> Someone proposed to have a _distinct color for status "unmaintained"._ > >> Status "unmaintained" is currently signalled with gray color, the same > >> as for status "unknown" > > This makes sense to me. Go for it. > > We as users cannot change the colors, because these are defined as > classes ext-status-<extensionstatus>. > and are _not_ defined in https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Extension .
They're defined in https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Gadget-site.css > Can someone perform a global wikitext source search on mediawiki on > which pages the string "ext-status-" is used ? I don't think you need to worry about someone using class="ext-status-unmaintained" elsewhere. > 00 BF FF (DeepBlueSky) may be a suitable background colour for > "unmaintained", see > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_colors#X11_color_names . DeepSkyBlue is pretty cheery on my screen, would sir prefer something in a decaying brown or green? I added ext-status-unmaintained to Gadget-site.css and made it #8B4513 (SaddleBrown ). Whatever works. BTW the template puts unmaintained extensions in Category:Not_LTS_ready . Cheers, -- =S Page software engineer on Editor Engagement Experiments _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
