Without having the origin page making the connection wouldnt be possible. (you would just end up suggesting the most common result in stead of the most accurate )
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Lee Worden <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe it could be done with just the Referer field on the second request, > without needing to log two different page requests and correlate them. > > Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:14:42 -0400 >> From: David Cuenca<[email protected]> >> >> >> Good idea, it could also help to know which are the links more used in a >> disambiguation page to sort them by importance. >> >> Micru >> >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Nicolas Vervelle<[email protected]>** >> wrote: >> >> >Interesting idea... >>> > >>> > >>> >On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Jon Robson<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >>>> > >I understand there is an issue that needs solving where various pages >>>> > >link to disambiguation pages. These need fixing to point at the >>>> > >appropriate thing. >>>> > > >>>> > >I had a thought on how this might be done using a variant of >>>> > >EventLogging... >>>> > > >>>> > >When a user clicks on a link that is a disambiguation page and then >>>> > >clicks on a link on that page we log an event that contains >>>> > > >>>> > >* page user was on before >>>> > >* page user is on now >>>> > > >>>> > >If we were to collect this data it would allow us to statistically >>>> > >suggest what the correct disambiguation page might be. >>>> > > >>>> > >To take a more concrete theoretical example: >>>> > >* If I am on the Wiki page for William Blake and click on London I am >>>> > >taken >>>> > >tohttps://en.wikipedia.org/**wiki/London_(disambiguation)<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_(disambiguation)> >>>> >>>> > >* I look through and see London (poem) and click on it >>>> > >* An event is fired that links London (poem) to William Blake. >>>> > > >>>> > >Obviously this won't always be accurate but I'd expect generally this >>>> > >would work (obviously we'd need to filter out bots) >>>> > > >>>> > >Then when editing William Blake say that disambiguation links are >>>> > >surfaced. If I go to fix one it might prompt me that 80% of visitors >>>> > >go from William Blake to London (poem). >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > >Have we done anything like this in the past? (Collecting data from >>>> > >readers and informing editors) >>>> > > >>>> > >I can imagine applying this sort of pattern could have various other >>>> > >uses... >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > >-- >>>> > >Jon Robson >>>> > >http://jonrobson.me.uk >>>> > >@rakugojon >>>> > > >>>> >>> > ______________________________**_________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l> > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
