4 is basically pointless. I hope that will never get approved (I very much
doubt it will anyway).

Alex Monk

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Yuvi Panda <yuvipa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yay! I see several good things that could come out of this, but to
> prevent pitchforks and misunderstandings, I think this RFC should be
> split some more.
>
> So ideally, this should be split into multiple RFCs. The ones I can
> think of, so far:
>
> 1. LESS support for RL.
> 2. Separate CSS(LESS?) that applies just to content, and is scoped as such.
> 3. An easier way to custom-style your wiki that does not require you
> to edit CSS, and also can be as flexible as the current one.
> 4. Remove customizability via Site / User CSS.
>
> 1 and 2 should mostly get general support, and *should* get what we
> want (content styles that we can load by themselves without
> conflicting the UI). 3 is awesome, but also very hard - and does not
> have a clear use case. 4 is akin to taking away internet from a
> hackerspace and is a lot, lot harder - and of limited benefit.
>
> So... split this? :)
>
> --
> Yuvi Panda T
> http://yuvi.in/blog
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to