This very article seems like yet another "Hey check out my brand new Wikipedia redesign!" story. No, you're not wrong. They took the170/385 numbers from the Labs stats.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:12 PM, hoo <[email protected]> wrote: > Am I wrong or did they actually calculate that for labs only (which > would be rather funny)? > At least they link to > https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Ask/-5B-5BResource-20Type::instance-5D-5D/-3FInstance-20Name/-3FInstance-20Type/-3FProject/-3FImage-20Id/-3FFQDN/-3FLaunch-20Time/-3FPuppet-20Class/-3FModification-20date/-3FInstance-20Host/-3FNumber-20of-20CPUs/-3FRAM-20Size/-3FAmount-20of-20Storage/searchlabel%3Dinstances/offset%3D0 > ("[...] that run on up to 385 instances [...]") which AFAIK doesn't have any > production servers. > > Cheers, > > Marius > > On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 15:44 +0100, David Gerard wrote: >> Analysts agree! >> http://www.rightscale.com/blog/cloud-cost-analysis/cloud-cost-analysis-how-much-could-wikipedia-save-cloud >> >> >_< >> >> >> - d. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikitech-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- З павагай, Павел Селіцкас/Pavel Selitskas Wizardist @ Wikimedia projects _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
