Le 26/09/13 00:46, Chad a écrit : >> > >> > What's actually the problem with expanding branches? >> > > To me at least, it makes it harder to see what's actually deployed at > a given time. Try `git branch -r` on core. We're at 86 branches now...that's > 172 if you've got two remotes. It's only going to get worse and it'll be > progressively harder to spot what's important.
We could simply delete the old branches after a few deployment cycles. If we want to keep the reference for history purposes, would tagging the tip of it be enough ? If you find yourself struggling to find out the last 2 wmf branches, you can write a tiny script to sort and filter the branches, keeping only the last two. -- Antoine "hashar" Musso _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
